Tonight on AA Legends:Updated
Greenday posted:Well, all that celebrate Rosh Hashanah thank you Oma, But that does not mean that what you are doing isn't wrong Just do something positive with your life, and leave those poor men (Rob Moshein and Bob Atchison) alone.Mike Newson published:I was thinking of talking about families and that special feeling you get when you first pick up that new born and know that, that little person will be with you the rest of your life. As for some reason this feeling has been on the top of my mind recently, even before Rosh Hashanah started and I was told what it represented. But then we get the people with the Psychosis’s who can not accept reality, who keep saying (no matter how many times they are told) that they are not talking to Oma Hamou, and yet they insist that they are, but offer not one drop of proof. Who come charging on and change a good (warm and fuzzy) state of mind into, chaos. Quote:
Psychosis is a generic psychiatric term for a mental state in which thought and perception are severely impaired. Persons experiencing a psychotic episode may experience hallucinations, hold delusional beliefs (e.g., grandiose or paranoid delusions), demonstrate personality changes and exhibit disorganized thinking (see thought disorder). This is often accompanied by lack of insight into the unusual or bizarre nature of such behavior, difficulties with social interaction and impairments in carrying out the activities of daily living. A psychotic episode is often described as involving a "loss of contact with reality"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychosis
Let’s see, Oma Hamou after defending Bob Atchison to the Russian people who she would be working with on her movie project, and finding that they would not work with her if she is associated with Bob Atchsion, tells Bob that he is not going to work with her on her project and resigns as a VP of his internet club, the Alexander Palace Association web club.
While Oma Hamou was going about her business nice and happy and carefree, Bob Atchison travels to Russia and tells her contacts there that she is a fugitive from justice, a con artist, wanted in America, and besides there is no project and she will never be back, so “don’t help believe her…” So who should leave who alone?
While Oma Hamou was in denial after being told what Bob Atchison was doing in Russia, she still continued on, working to complete a dream. Bob Atchison called or wrote to anyone he thought might be associated with her projects and told them that she was a criminal and a fugitive from justice, had no project, and look at what she did to Father Markell --- seduced him, scammed him, caused him to lose his home and in general used her faith as a weapon against her, and as his reason to attack Oma Hamou … So who should leave who alone?
Oma, now starting to get concerned, as she lost funding, but having worked hard was about to get it back, and then Bob Atchison came out with his very first web page right on the Alexander Palace dot Org site, and told the whole world, all those millions of visitors to that site, that Oma Hamou was a fugitive from justice and how bad a person she was… So who should leave who alone?
Bob Atchison now plays hide-the-site, going from free web host to free web host, “improving” what he says about Oma Hamou (See “the Big Lie” in my previous comments) all the time, but at least now he no longer says that Oma was a fugitive from justice as he seems to have figured out that what he had said all this time was wrong. That it hurt the many people working with Oma Hamou did not seem to matter to him, as long as he could hurt Oma Hamou … Eventually this all ended at “Rob registering the domain name” Oma Hamou Report dot Org in his name, until he was told:
Quote:
"...The court finds and concludes that third party plaintiffs have shown a likelihood of success on the merits of this cause, that a temporary injunction is necessary to prevent harm to Ms. Hamou. That unless injunction lies, third party plaintiffs (ed.: Oma, et. al.) will be without any adequate remedy at law, in that no amount of damages will be able to repair the loss of reputation to the parties..."
See: http://www.omahamou.com/PDF/ApplicationRestrainingOrderAgainstRobMoshein.pdf http://www.omahamou.com/PDF/RestrainingOrderIssuedAgainstPallasartOmaHamouSite050207.pdf http://www.omahamou.com/PDF/RestrainingOrderIssuedAgainstPallasartsOmaHamouSite.pdf
So who should leave who alone?
Eventually seeming to have given up on using Father Markell as his reason for attacking, he (Bob Atchison) now reduces a half million dollar law suit against her, to one issue of Oma Hamou owes me some money… In this law suit it was found that Bob Atchison tells police one thing in his many police reports about Oma Hamou, (such as the one where he tells the police that Oma had threatened to expose him as a gay male, while he him self had come out of the closet and published on the internet long ago that he was) and the courts another in order to win a law suit. (I believe that this is typically called perjury in legal circles, I’d just say he lied in order to win. So who should leave who alone?
Even here on Legends, it was almost quiet, those who felt a need to vent had done so, when Bob Atchison’s “people” descended and attacked and turned this site into a battle ground to the point that Ms. Davis was forced to separate this thread from the rest of the site.
Anastasia has been accused of being Oma, Justin has been accused of being Oma, Justin’s wife has been accused of being Oma, Jim has been accused of being Oma, Ivanka has been accused of being Oma, and I have been accused of being Oma. (Anyone see any trends here?)
So who should leave who alone?
Here on Legends Oma Hamou was accused of being an international super star in many area’s and teased and bullied that she was not. And yet she never claimed such status. A person who writes - is a writer, published or not. A person who acts - is an actor/actress, even if their name never appeared on the film credits of a block buster movie. A person who works on producing a film - is a film producer, even if they have never released a block buster. But the people bulling and harassing her said she claimed she was a super star in all these areas, and unmercifully hounded those here who believed other wise.
Does anyone remember those childhood bullies on the playground and how they twisted things around to tease? And do you remember how hurt you were by that teasing/bullying?
So who should leave who alone?
Here are some more things to look at while I am working on my next novel, and in the vein of the ongoing education that I have attempted so that people will be able to recognize propaganda techniques and now personality disorders when they encounter them.
The serial bully displays behavior congruent with many of the diagnostic criteria for Narcissistic Personality Disorder. Characterized by a pervasive pattern of grandiosity and self-importance, need for admiration, and lack of empathy, people with narcissistic personality disorder overestimate their abilities and inflate their accomplishments, often appearing boastful and pretentious, whilst correspondingly underestimating and devaluing the achievements and accomplishments of others.
Often the narcissist will fraudulently claim to have qualifications or experience or affiliations or associations which they don't have or aren't entitled to. Belief in superiority, inflating their self-esteem to match that of senior or important people with whom they associate or identify, insisting on having the "top" professionals or being affiliated with the "best" institutions, but criticizing the same people who disappoint them are also common features of narcissistic personality disorder.
Narcissists react angrily to criticism and when rejected, the narcissist will often denounce the profession which has rejected them (usually for lack of competence or misdeed) but simultaneously and paradoxically represent themselves as belonging to the profession they are vilifying.
Fragile self-esteem, a need for constant attention and admiration, fishing for compliments (often with great charm), an expectation of superior entitlement, expecting others to defer to them, and a lack of sensitivity especially when others do not react in the expected manner, are also hallmarks of the disorder. Greed, expecting to receive before and above the needs of others, overworking those around them, and forming romantic (sic) or sexual relationships for the purpose of advancing their purpose or career, abusing special privileges and squandering extra resources also feature.
People with narcissistic personality disorder also have difficulty recognizing the needs and feelings of others, and are dismissive, contemptuous and impatient when others share or discuss their concerns or problems. They are also oblivious to the hurtfulness of their behavior or remarks, show an emotional coldness and a lack of reciprocal interest, exhibit envy (especially when others are accorded recognition), have an arrogant, disdainful and patronizing attitude, and are quick to blame and criticize others when their needs and expectations are not met.
http://www.bullyonline.org/workbully/npd.htm
Where are people bullied?
· at work by their manager or co-workers or subordinates, or by their clients (bullying, workplace bullying, mobbing, work abuse, harassment, discrimination)
· at home by their partner or parents or siblings or children (bullying, assault, domestic violence, abuse, verbal abuse)· at school (bullying, harassment, assault)
· in the care of others, such as in hospital, convalescent homes, care homes, residential homes (bullying, harassment, assault)
· in the armed forces (bullying, harassment, discrimination, assault)· by those in authority (harassment, abuse of power)
· by neighbors and landlords (bullying, harassment)
· by strangers (harassment, stalking, assault, sexual assault, rape, grievous bodily harm, murder)
How do you know if you're being bullied? Bullying differs from harassment and assault in that the latter can result from a single incident or small number of incidents - which everybody recognizes as harassment or assault - whereas [b]bullying tends to be an accumulation of many small incidents over a long period of time. Each incident tends to be trivial, and on its own and out of context does not constitute an offence or grounds for disciplinary or grievance action.
http://www.bullyonline.org/workbully/amibeing.htm
So who should leave who alone?
April 21, 2006 Oma Hamou published on this forum a statement:
"... I have endured, and am enduring, being the victim of a hate crime, of being stalked, and have endured extreme invasions of my privacy. Through out the course of uncovering Mr. Atchison and those associated with his company, Pallasart’s trail, and waiting for justice, my world has become a living nightmare. I honestly believe that the victimization will never end, that I will never become whole again....I personally was and am so extremely affected and distracted through out this ordeal that I suffer at times from a nearly non-existent appetite, very little sleep, depression, mood swings and I have suffered a number of close calls medically because of the stress. My daily life, far from being productive and fulfilling, is consumed with the ferocious chore of restoring my name and attempting to quell any future abuse by Mr. Atchison and his company, Pallasart and its associates. I’ve lost identification with the person I really am inside and shut myself out of social functions because of the negativity this has caused on my life. Unless you have endured being stalked and persecuted, with what has felt to me to be a religious cult like zeal, you will have no comprehension of the devastation that being stalked and hated can create in your life, even to the fears that you face in just waking up...No words will ever be strong enough to completely convince others what this period in my life since my discovery of what Mr. Atchison, Mr. Moshein and those associated with Pallasart have been doing to me is like, every day filled with; terror, aggravation, unceasing anger and frustration. I awake every morning to emotionally charged livid angst. I strike out unreasonably at those who I loved. I unceasingly am forced to live through a clouded reality, one seriously altered by the horrendous actions of one man, Mr. Atchison who committed or influenced a series of unforgivable acts against me, even using my church and faith as a weapon against me...At times I became someone I hated, because of the emotions and associated words that were forced out of me. The existence of Mr. Atchison’s attentions robbed me of the normal life I have strived for and entirely deserve. My life should be one in which I, and I alone, should be held responsible and accountable for my personal life and its failures and triumphs. For me, the most personally frightening moment was dealing with the fact that Mr. Atchison hated me so much that he would plot and concoct a murder for hire scheme. A scheme in which I could’ve been arrested and prosecuted for a crime I never committed or took part in. It is frightening to know that someone hates me so much that they would go to such extremes. Although I am living what may on the surface seem to be a normal life with normal freedoms, this is far from the truth...I have never deserved less than a normal life, one free of the ill effects of a heinous individual who deliberately and unabashedly used and abused my world and my past. I am a law abiding citizen, who never deserved to be haunted, stalked shadowed and harassed. I have lived and breathed the nightmare of a hate crime I have learned what it is to be in the crosshairs of a cult. I will tell you first hand this is devastation beyond any outsider’s comprehension, a nearly unbearable burden that no one should ever have to suffer. At times I have felt that Mr. Atchison was the father of lies, so adroitly has he wielded this weapon..."
Not so long ago some one posted a message on Pallasart’s the Alexander Palace Time Machine and Rob Moshein or was it really Bob Atchison who responded wrote:
Dear Oscarwilde;
That scurrillous website (and frankly I'm sceptical about how you "found" it, since it does not appear in search engines) is essentially all slander and fiction, including a supposed memo which was faked. Mr. Atchison was hired as a historical consultant by someone who failed to live up to their contractual agreement (and who it turned out was a three time convicted felon for crimes of fraud and who owes almost $1 million in judgments to many other people). As a result he filed a lawsuit against them, which went to a jury trial, and he won the lawsuit. The defendant in the suit attempted to discredit Mr. Atchison by means of this same libel and slander to attempt somehow to force him to drop his lawsuit or perhaps as some sort of weird revenge. We ingore this garbage, as that is all it is - most especially considering the source...It appears that this new website is somehow linked to the loser of the lawsuit, as it is all the same old stuff, obviously just "sour grapes" from a poor loser who does not want to pay the judgement and who is now in contempt of court and now subject to jail time in Texas for failing to pay sactions levied by the Court for their abuse of the legal process in the lawsuit.
Please rest assured that Anatoly Kotchumov considered Mr. Atchison as a second son. The set of photographs he gave Bob was a duplicate copy set of the originals which are still at the AP, and the duplicates were Kotchumov's personal property. He never took anything from the palace. Bob was single handedly responsible for the American Express dontation to the palace for the new roof. Many many people in Tsarskoe Selo consider Bob a close personal friend. Disregard that scurrilous website.
See: http://www.omahamou.com/pdf/affidavit/exhibit072.pdf
The documents described in either Bob Atchison or Rob Moshein’s post on Pallasart’s, Alexander Palace Time Machine Forum concerns the previous litigation and Bob Atchison’s Response. Example, the Memo to John Stubbs by Bob Atchison dated July 2, 1997 was a document Mr. Atchison produced in accordance to the request of line 1 of http://www.omahamou.com/pdf/affidavit/exhibit098.pdf
The same goes to the document concerning Mr. Kuchumov the former director of the Alexander Palace in Russia line 21 of http://www.omahamou.com/pdf/affidavit/exhibit098.pdf The documents featured on http://www.bobatchison.co.uk/ are the same documents described above.
Both documents, the Bob Atchison Memo to a Mr. Stubbs and the Kuchumov document were documents that HE (and I do mean Robert {Bob} Atchison) through his attorney submitted in the discovery process. These two specific documents are BATE STAMPED or SEQUENTIAL PAGE NUMBER RANGE (Yes the word is Bate not Date, go ask Texas as I don’t know why, --- and look in the bottom right corner? Notice the P for Plaintiff? Meaning that Bob supplied this information to the courts?) if these documents are faked as the Forum Administrator of the Alexander Palace Time Machine states then Bob Atchison himself "faked" it or the statement that the FA made was simply an attempt to direct the focus elsewhere. (I think I have brought up the rules behind the “Big Lie” malaprop propaganda technique? If you are unaware of this please read more about the method at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Lie)
However, given the number of times that documents that were introduced on Legends were claimed by “Them” to be fakes or fraud, well it seems that such intent is a part of “their” mindset. It would seem that in the heart of Bob Atchison he never thought that the Police or anyone else would ever back Oma to the point of providing her with not only reports but notes and such on what was told to them. Or that he ever thought that various comments would ever be gathered in one location so that people could compare what was said at different times and places. Sure it was not simple to wade through all the exhibits to verify for yourself what was said in those court exhibits and that indeed at different times and places different things were said by Bob Atchison. One has to understand the fierce desire to keep the public from learning the truth and seeing with their own eyes the disparate statements. This is not in accordance with even the most rudimentary concepts behind the “Big Lie,” The Big Lie only works when people are denied the facts, and or are lead in such a manner that they never exert the effort to discover them for themselves.
On AA Legends...
