JUDGE THIS...

By Mike Newson

UPDATE

In the "beginning" there was Oma and Life promised that things would never be dull around her … (especially for those close to her ;) )

Starting of humble birth in the mountains of south eastern USA, Oma came into this world fated it would seem to attract all the wrong attention. Starting in childhood she experienced "things" --- traumas --- that most of us only read about in the newspapers. Life was such that she escaped the only way she knew how and left home as a very young teen with basically nothing but a baby doll and traveled to the home of the stars – Los Angeles California, or more specifically Hollywood.This was a trip that would happen several times in her young life. You see she was very lucky and met the right person and instead of becoming a street walker as a teenager --- she walked with the stars.

The basic outcome? She eventually stayed in LA where she became a model and actress and met with moderate success as a model, hanging out with the jet set crowd and seeing the world. Even today, if you keep your eyes open, (something most of us don't do while watching this type of programming) you can see short clips of her now and then in TV advertisements where they use what the industry calls stock footage. (Her heyday was before the Internet so we do not find tons of photos of her all over the place…) Stunning of figure and introduced to the right people she started to make inroads into the etertainment industry, she had a long hard row to hoe.

Then we introduce into the plot the now ex husband --- Marcus Demian born to a different name many, many, many years before Oma was even a twinkle in her fathers eye, and the user of many names over time, a somewhat successful writer in the entertainment field, but with a strange appetite for women that would make Oma his tenth wife (and she most certainly was not his last wife). Oma seemingly attracted him not only with her body but I'd say that with his past experiences that he could tell that here was a woman that was ripe for the types of manipulation he was capable of. The marriage turned turbulent right off the bat with several incidents of domestic abuse and temporary restraining orders however, there is something that is strange about women who have had experiences like Oma has had, they keep coming back to the one who hurts them, attempting to defuse and appease the situation, it is as if they have some compulsion that transcends all that most of us would call common sense. Besides if nothing else Oma Hamou is first and foremost a mother.

There is a Hate-Oma Blog, that Marcus has confirmed is maintained by Rob/Bob, that claims Oma kidnapped Marcus's children and didn't have permission to take the children anywhere. Yet an order was signed by the COURT instructing the Sheriff to remove the children from their father and deliver them to their biological mother. Both women were told by the Sheriff to take all three children and “Get out of Dodge” as Marcus was mad as hell and was gunning for bear. Custody of Marcus's two small children were given by way of a court order to their biological mother and because of what was told to the women, Oma hid all three children including her own small son and the mother in a different city. The state of Montana knew the circumstances but Bob/Rob, et. al., do not --- and because the records pertaining to the children are SEALED by the State of Montana, I don't think they ever will other than as we attempt to set the record right. (Why we attempt it is beyond me as “they” never modify their story to reflect reality, they just keep on portraying that their story is the whole truth no matter how or how often we correct them. Well now and then they do respond to what “we” say and make modifications, generally to justify their position, or add some more of what they think is dirt about Oma in a continuing attempt to get someone, anyone, to hate Oma and believe them. The only way they will accept any fact is if it places the worst possible light on Oma. I think in part that for them to admit that even one piece of their story is false would be to have their whole house of cards fall down around them, at least in their eyes. The funniest part of this is that they say they have the “right” to say this about Oma and “laugh” when we say that they do not, yet when this was brought to court the court granted a Temporary Restraining Order in favor of Oma as she had shown a likelihood of winning the case of libel against Rob Moshein/Bob Atchison and yet they continue to do the same things that they were told not to do.…)

Turning our attention back to the "kidnapping" allegations made on that Hate-Oma Blog --- despite a court order that in part prevented Marcus from going anywhere near his children and Oma's or the women (Oma & the biological mother) he found the two small children and convinced their mother that if she traveled to California that Montana wouldn't have jurisdiction and they would be free. He flew them (the children and their mother) to California and a few days later showed up with someone who pretended to be a cop there to arrest the mother of his children for violating the court order. He then kidnaps the children and returns back to Montana as if he is some kind of hero. The mother reports the kidnapping and when Marcus returns he is surrounded by law enforcement at gun point and the children are placed in foster care. One other little tid-bit, the guy who impersonated a cop was later arrested, plead guilty, while Marcus maintained his distance and claimed he didn't have anything to do with it.

Over time there emerged one horrifyingly real pattern, the children were being "used" by her ex husband at first in denial and later held in sway by his manipulation and abuse, she eventually left him and returned back to the abuse several times, facing many horrors at his hand. (Ask someone who knows about this type of trauma and ask them what happens to short term memory in such cases, ask them what the victim will do and say to escape the horror, ask them about the denial that the victims exhibit.)

Obviously he had to discredit or remove the women in order to be left free to continue to feed his appetites. (Can one say -Motive?) And he used his writing skills and crafted a plot worthy of the big screen. Manipulating Oma in the way that only one suffering from past traumas and now in the thrall of battered wife syndrome could be manipulated -- she kept returning trying to appease the beast in any way she could.

The end result, Oma went to jail according to the script. Her Ex promised her all sorts of things (such as; he would get her out and pay for everything using their joint assets , which her being in jail left him in control of (such as the $100,000 plus joint ownership apartment building that he sold without telling her while she was in jail), and all would be made well --- her son would stay alive…) IF she would do what he told her and such is the mindset of one suffering battered wife syndrome that she did what he said --- always trying to appease the beast that held her soul captive. (One aspect of battered wife syndrome is that the victim will do just about anything to defuse the situation and typically believes that it is all their fault….) He even told her that if she had not been in jail that she would have been dead, just like he said his previous wife and the mother of those other children was. Later in this story, after he almost killed her, she broke free, it took the apparent death of the mother of his children (the wife before Oma came on the scene) --- a death he bragged about --- and Oma's almost death at his hands (The color photos of her body after he finished beating her make you sick) and the death of her unborn child (caused by the beating) for her to begin to see the light, but she did see it and never again could he control her like he had.

In one of several letters to the court Marcus Demian’s attorney writes:

NOTICE THE RESIDENTIAL ADDRESS LISTED ON BOTH THE APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOL BEVERAGE & CONTROL AND THE BANK OF AMERICA STATEMENT AND THAT OF THE RESIDENTIAL ADDRESS LISTED ON A LETTER TO OMA HAMOU.

Did you know that in California the statute of limitations has not expired for murder, fraud, conspiracy to commit murder and all sorts of stuff that Marcus Demian did?

Oma has the evidence including cancelled checks to the man Marcus hired to pretend he was a cop, checks he pretended to give on behalf of Oma but never did, bank statements, letters, tape recordings that he himself made and thought that he had disposed of in a trash bin.

Anyway after the divorce, Oma got married in 1994 one more time and acquired the last name of Hamou, there was still some mop-up to handle because of the events that transpired while she lived that nightmare with Demian but afterwards she lived in Israel, Switzerland, and London before returning to L.A., where she came up with a concept to turn one of the novels she had written during this time period into a movie and formed a production company which in time would take her to Russia.

Now we introduce the next set of villains in this little play. Bob Atchison and his life partner Rob Moshein who, seeming to "own" the Alexander Palace in Russia, and having an excellent web site on the subject. Oma thought she had found someone who could help with the historical accuracy of the movie project, his web site said great things about him and Russia, but when she actually traveled to Russia she found that the claims were empty shells. Forced to resign her association with Bob Atchison and his web association, in order for the Russians to even think about working with her. The net result is that for the next five and half years she would be faced with opposition in the form of Bob attempting (and succeeding) to stop her in any way he could so that the project would not succeed.

Was jealousy a motive for his actions, jealousy in that he felt the Alexander Palace was his? After all, he talked to the dead empress in visions, did "she" tell him to stop Oma Hamou?

Was it that he felt he was the gatekeeper of all things dealing with this time in history? Or did he have to discredit Oma to maintain his own illusion of control and authority in regards to this historical time period, and associated buildings, people and events?

So far the motive remains a mystery, unlike Marcus, where the apparent motive is the feeding of a warped sexual appetite, Bob Atchison's motives are still unknown. What is known is that he hates Oma, and wants the world to hate her and those around her. Although to be honest at times I wonder if it is not Rob Moshein who is the driving force behind the daily activities on the web. There is a long complex tale behind these few words here: accusations and counter accusations, words written attacking Oma and words debunking those words, attack - defend and counter attack, the ebb and flow of a battle of words fought on the internet, where probably thousands of years from now people will be able to go back and read all about it.

Basically one has to go on patterns of behavior to understand it all. For example, when one looks at the patterns we find that patterns of denial of actions in regards to attacks on Oma Hamou on the internet exists in public while, to insiders and others such as during attempts to have the police go after Oma, or in court, responsibility for the sites attacking Oma exist.

The short story is that after finding that he would not have a part of the new project Bob went after anyone who he thought might work with Oma to accomplish her dreams and tried to convince them that she was a horrible person because of what happened with Marcus so many years ago. He took the battle public on the internet, at first on his own site, and then through other sites, including one site in which it turns out the web master was a friend of mine and he retrieved the sign up record for the "free" web site that had the hate-Oma Hamou diatribe posted. The record showed that a Pallasart (Bob's Company) IP address was used to create the site. Now in line with this thought, at one point Dunn & Bradstreet had a report about Oma that she does not know how the report came to be in existence and which she corrected the results after she found out about it, but not before Bob Atchison and Rob Moshein used it to show negative things about Oma. Now we have a similar situation, as when they used my friends site to host their diatribe, coming into existence (details to follow when the legal teams says it is Ok to talk) in that we have found, and documented, where a Pallasart IP was used to create a very recent business report about one of Oma's company’s similar in nature to the D&B report. As the pattern now exists where in we can prove that a Pallasart IP was used to create this report, could not the same pattern be applied to the D&B report. That is what is the validity of these reports when one finds that Rob/Bob (they really are one entity) are behind the creation of them?

Patterns, Patterns, Patterns --- this is the key to understanding. If you take the time to go back and study the issues, notice that several women have had similar experiences (patterns) with Marcus? Notice that several people have had similar experiences (Patterns) with Bob Atchison/Rob Moshein/Pallasart, et. al. Notice that there is a pattern of saying that something is true with no supportive documentation to back it up, it is just true because they say it is and believe them.… Or, of misreading the documentation, or using partial quotes out of context. Cut and pasting emails such that they provide a story line that supports their point of view. Then when Oma’s defenders provide the documentation to debunk what they state is the “Whole Truth” then it must be faked (Photoshopped) or otherwise falsified. When we show using documented evidence that there is a pattern of falsehoods being issued by the hate-Oma groups then we are stalking them and they are the victims. It will take some time and digging to find the truth of are Oma Hamou’s defenders telling the truth, or is she this monster that those who wish you to hate her say she is. The way you can tell is found in the patterns, such as the pattern of the various Hate-Oma web sites and blogs stating that Bob Atchison has nothing to do with the words published therein. Yet what was the evidence of the various police reports that have been published concerning this? (Bob Atchison claimed ownership.) Remember how the various Oma Hamou Report web sites denied any involvement of Bob/Rob, yet in the end who owns the domain? (Rob Moshein is the owner of record) Bob has claimed responsibility in private (remember that we have informants from the inner circle) for what was denied in public… I think when all is done and finished that we will find that Bob is at the center of it all, that everything swirls around him, the center of influence and motivation, as if a spider in the center of the web of deceit that has been spun about Oma and all of us who defend her.

In the end I think that the legal system will vindicate itself and call to accountability the actions of Rob Moshein and Bob Atchison (Pallasart, et.al.) as well as Marcus Demian now that he has inserted himself into the mix. At one point I think Oma was willing to just have her name cleared, but now, based on the nature of the threats issued, I think it may have gone to far for such a simple ending. What was once historically overlooked is now taken very seriously by the law and law enforcement.

So I think appropriate action will be taken after due process is exercised to validate the mountain of evidence that has been obtained or retained. And then, the evidence having been validated by the system, then I think we will see action on the civil front.

As I have said before, I do not feel that Oma is this lily white virgin from next door who never missed a day of Sunday school in her life. She made more than her share of mistakes, some can be excused because of the circumstances and some can’t. Much can be understood when you study the trauma of childhood abuse and the battered spouse syndrome. At one point she was a world class model and all that, that profession entails in terms of her body being the primary tool of that profession, I.E. nudity or in her case --- almost nude. So an angel? Not even on her best days!

Oma is more of a warrior of her Russian heritage --- never quitting. The bottom line is not that she made mistakes, but that she took responsibility for them, no matter the cause, made restitution to correct the mistakes and picked herself up one more time. This is the essence of why I respect her, and defend her. That she keeps picking herself up just one more time.

QUOTE MIKE NEWSON: The Demian Marital Assets Document images were republished with permission by Oma Hamou.

A HISTORY OF VIOLENCE - UPDATE

1) Did you know that had Marcus Demian followed through on his representations to the court Oma Hamou would have never been convicted of any crime in any State?

In one of several letters to the court Marcus Demian’s attorney writes:

[Excerpts] “…Mr. Demian stated to me that although he and his wife have experienced marital difficulties in the past, they are now firmly reconciled. Mr. Demian has authorized me to represent to you and the court …that he is …willing to make arrangements with the banks and prosecutors in Utah and Montana in order to make restitution on behalf of his wife…"

2) Did you know on December 17, 1990 Marcus Demian had his then wife, Oma write a check to pay for their airline flight from Cody, Wyoming to Los Angeles, California and the check was secured by his AMEX?

3) Did you know in more than one marriage of Marcus Demian there is a history of guns, drugs, and violence?

4) Did you know Marcus Demian “almost” succeeded in killing 2 of his wives that we know of and while inflicting "great bodily injure" to one of the wives killed his unborn child?

5) Did you know that because of Marcus Demian 2 of his wives went to jail and so did someone else?

6) Did you know Oma Hamou was so afraid her husband would make good on his threats of harm that she asked the courts permission, with respect to the children, to hide her child in a different state?

7) Did you know Marcus Demian can be prosecuted for "crimes" he committed in the State of California?

Something to think about....

Source: Internet archives OmaHamou.com

UPDATE

Reporting as a fact

OMA HAMOU REALITY BLOG states:

1997

July 9: According to the Sand Diego Sherrif's office, Oma Hamou was arrested again in San Diego as a Felony Fugitive from Justice for violation of her Montana probation. San Diego Case CD129280. She was jailed for one month until extradited back to Yellowstone County, Billings, Montana on August 15. She paid the required restitution in Montana and was released.

YET THE ACTUAL COURT RECORD REFLECTS HAMOU WAS NEVER

EXTRADITED TO THE STATE OF MONTANA:

Hence once again demonstrating Oma Hamou has been truthful in revealing information about her criminal convictions and proving Bob Atchison/Rob Moshein are only interested in their nimidation.

Borrowing a word that the folks over on that other blog like tn their paranoia and false premise on just this one issue, I suggest you take the rest of their statements with the same required truckload of salt. What does the fact that they can only attack those people as a response to addressing this REALITY tell you? I know what it tells us..."

UPDATE: When one reads a person has been arrested and extradited to a different state the image conjured up is a "prisoner in chains" and no matter how the folks over on that other blog attempts to put a spin on it, this is the image they want you to see.

ADDITIONAL INFO: According to Bob Atchison/Rob Moshein/Pallasart they claim in 1991 Oma Hamou was arrested in Billings, Montana using the name Oma Hamou. Yet police records from Montana show Oma was never arrested in 1991 using the name of Hamou and according to Oma herself in a published statement made on her forum she writes she "...didn't meet anyone by the name of Hamou until 1994..."

A simple Google search provides countless examples of absolutely horrifying cases where individuals have had their lives destroyed as a result of a psycho who lives to harass people on the Internet. It is absolutely reprehensible for someone to be able to come up with false, malicious and defamatory information about someone with the intent of destroying their character, and be able to do so with impunity and anonymity.

Source: http://www.omahamou.com/PDF/OmaHamouLetterBobAtchison81306.pdf

READ ROB MOSHEIN'S PLEADINGS: http://omahamou.com/PDF/RobMosheinRequestSummary.pdf &

http://omahamou.com/PDF/HAMOUANSWERMOSHEINSUMMARY.PDF

Did Hamou Really Hire someone to kill Bob Atchison???

UPDATE

Justin Edwards wrote:

Recently Oma Hamou's ex Husband told her he knew all about her attempt to murder Bob Atchison let's examine the real facts behind Atchison's allegation.

For 5 1/2 years, Rob Moshein/ Bob Atchison/ and Bob's web company, Pallasart concocted many lies and schemes which they told to law enforcement agencies in both California & Texas and others such as but not limited to the FBI, Homeland Security, U.S. Marshalls and the U.S. State Department "hoping" someone would believe what they were saying about Oma and toss her ass in jail. After having "thoroughly" investigated the claims made against Oma Hamou law enforcement realized it was a bunch of bullshit made up by a group of sociopaths who held a vendetta.

Bob Atchison claims Oma Hamou hired someone to kill him because he filed a civil law suit against her and believed if she killed him, the law suit would go away. But when the police took Bob Atchison's phone records and the phone records of the alleged hitman and compared dates and time they discovered Bob Atchison contacted the "alleged" hit man first and the first email sent to Bob Atchison by the alleged hit man didn't say anything about Oma Hamou hiring or wanting to hurt anyone.

And no the Austin police department never called Bob Atchison even though he swears up and down they did, they didn't. Take a look for yourself at Bob Atchison's phone records and you'll see he contacted the police first to report he got a call (key words: got a call) from someone who claimed he was hired to kill him the Austin Police Department dispatcher sent out a patrol car out to his home.

According to sources, to this day Bob Atchison claims he is a victim...poor baby give that man a box of tissue cause he's going to need it when they put his ass inside a jail cell next to some guy named BUBBA :-)

UPDATE:

When Bob Atchison received the below eMail from the "alleged" Hitman's wife he sent back a reply and requested a telephone number – obviously she provided it to him but we simply don’t know how it happened because Mr. Atchison never provided Oma's attorney with the information. The next communication sent is later that same evening where (again) Bob Atchison selectively ‘cuts & pasts’ from an email sent to him by "Patricia" the alleged hitman's wife.

Reviewing Bob Atchison's phone records it is apparent that from June 17, 2004 at 10:16 AM until 11:25 AM Bob attempted to call Patricia … on 12 separate occasions. As the phone logs show on the 13th attempt, at 11:25 AM, he was successful in making a connection and spoke with someone for approximately 17 minutes. Then it appears he lost the connection and at 11:43 AM reestablished that connection which lasted approximately 27 minutes longer.

Considering the time from the first email to the point at which the police were first called one has to wonder, if this was really a true plot to murder Mr. Atchison, why did it take so long? Mr. Atchison’s phone records reflect that on June 17, 2004 at 12:29 PM he contacted the Austin Police Department who sent out a patrol car to his home. Officer Alfredo Delvalle took Mr. Atchison’s statement at 12:36 PM.

Atchison's Attorney and Hamou's discusses the Atchison's

Murder for Hire Scheme

Source: AA Legends & OmaHamou.com

NO. GN303141
ROBERT ATCHISON
§
IN THE DISTRICT COURT
Plaintiff,
§

§

V.
§
345TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

§

OMA HAMOU
§

Defendant.
§
OF TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS

AGREED ORDER GRANTING PERMANENT INJUNCTION

This case was heard the _______ day of _______, 2005. The parties appeared and announced ready for trial. The Court finds that the parties have agreed to the requested relief, that relief being that Oma Hamou, Defendant and Third Party Plaintiff in this action and The Sarskaia Foundation and Enigma Films, Inc. Intervenors and Third Party Plaintiffs in this action, are entitled to a permanent injunction against Third Party Defendant, Robert Atchison. It is, therefore,

ORDERED that Robert Atchison, Third Party Defendant in this action is permanently enjoined from communicating with or disseminating to any person or entity, either directly or indirectly, for any purpose whatsoever, any statement, information, or depiction concerning or related to Oma Hamou, Enigma Films, Inc., Enigma Royal Films, LLC, Enigma Royal Films, Inc. or The Sarskaia Foundation, save and except only for the Statement of Robert Atchison attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and made a part of this Order.

ORDERED that Robert Atchison, Third Party Defendant in this action is permanently enjoined from directing others or going within two-hundred (200) yards of any of Oma Hamou’s place of residence or that of Enigma and The Sarskaia Foundation’s place of business.

ORDERED that Robert Moshein, Third Party Defendant in this action is permanently enjoined from communicating with or disseminating to any person or entity, either directly or indirectly, for any purpose whatsoever, any statement, information, or depiction concerning or related to Oma Hamou, Enigma Films, Inc., Enigma Royal Films, LLC, Enigma Royal Films, Inc. or The Sarskaia Foundation, save and except only for the Statement of Robert Atchison attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and made a part of this Order.

ORDERED: that Robert Moshein, Third Party Defendant in this action is permanently enjoined from directing others or going within two-hundred (200) yards of any of Hamou, Enigma and The Sarskaia Foundation’s place of business.

ORDERED: that Robert Moshein, Third Party Defendant in this action is permanently enjoined from directing others or going within two-hundred (200) yards of Hamou’s residence.

ORDERED: that, in addition to any other remedies available to Oma Hamou, Enigma Films, Inc. and The Sarskaia Foundation, said parties shall be entitled to liquidated damages in the amount of $5,000, in the aggregate, for each communication or act of dissemination of any information, statement or depiction in violation of this Order upon an offering of proof of said violation and a finding of this court of said violation, provided, however, that the aforestated remedy of the imposition of liquidated damages shall be cumulative and shall not impair or limit the rights of Oma Hamou, Enigma Films, Inc. and The Sarskaia Foundation to other and further relief, including but not limited to contempt, injunctive relief and damages in excess of or in addition to liquidated damages upon a showing of proof in support thereof.

ORDERED: that, for purposes of this Order, each day that the internet is used as an instrumentality to communicate or disseminate any statement, information or depiction in violation of this Order shall constitute a separate violation of this Order.

Signed this ________ day of _________, 2005.

_______________________________
Judge Presiding

NO. GN303141
ROBERT ATCHISON
§
IN THE DISTRICT COURT
Plaintiff,
§
§

V.
§
345TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

§

OMA HAMOU
§

Defendant.
§
OF TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

STATE OF TEXAS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
COUNTY OF TRAVIS

WHEREAS, Robert Atchison (hereinafter “Atchison”) initiated the above cited cause on or about August 21, 2003 (hereinafter “the Lawsuit”) against Oma Hamou (hereinafter “Hamou”) asserting that a Hamou was indebted to Atchison as a result of certain commercial dealings with her and,
WHEREAS, Oma Hamou, Enigma Films, Inc. and The Sarskaia Foundation intervened in the Lawsuit and, thereafter, joined as third party defefendants, Pallasart Web Ventures, Inc. (hereinafter “Pallasart”) and Robert Moshein (hereinafter “Moshein”) asserting that Atchison was indebted to Hamou as a result of certain commercial dealings with him and further, asserting various other wrongdoing on the part of Atchison and his business Pallasart, and

WHEREAS, Robert Atchison and Pallasart and Hamou and Hamou’ s Businesses desire to fully and finally settle and compromise each and all of the parities claims, demands, liabilities or actions of any kind or character, against the other, known or unknown, existing now or at any time previous to this settlement;

NOW THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows:

1. Atchison and Hamou and Hamou’s Businesses agree that a final agreed judgment, in form and substance identical to that set forth in Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and made a part hereof, shall be entered by the court within ten (10) days of the date of the mutual execution of this settlement agreement, which judgment shall award damages payable by Atchison to Hamou and Hamou’s Businesses in the amount of $1.00 for defamation of Hamou and Hamou’s Businesses. The Judgment will not be published or otherwise conveyed directly or indirectly, to any third party by Robert Atchison without the prior written consent of Oma Hamou. Upon entry of the Judgment, all bonds posted in this case shall be redelivered to Oma Hamou.

2. Atchison and Hamou and Hamou’s Businesses agree that a Permanent Injunction, in form and substance identical to that set forth in Exhibit “B”, attached hereto and made a part hereof, shall be entered by the court within ten (10) days of the date of the mutual execution of this settlement agreement, which Permanent Injunction shall enjoin Atchison from publishing or making statements concerning Hamou and Hamou’s Businesses as provided in Exhibit B.

3. Each of the respective parties to this Agreement shall be responsible for payment of all attorneys’ fees and costs of court incurred by them and shall not be liable to any other party hereto for payment of said fees and costs.

4. Hamou and Hamou’s Businesses, in consideration of Atchison’s covenants herein, including but not limited Atchison’s promise to fully and faithfully comply with the Permanent Injunction described in Exhibit B hereto, does hereby RELEASE and forever DISCHARGE Atchison, his agents, servants and representatives, and Pallasart and its’ agents, servants, and representatives from any and all claims, causes of action, debts, demands, obligations, liabilities and suits whatever, of any kind or character, whether known or unknown, in any manner and in any capacity claimed, owned, held or possessed by Hamou or Hamou’s Businesses, or their agents, servants, representatives, successors or assigns, whether or not any such claim, cause of action, debt, demand, obligation, liability or suit was raised in the Lawsuit. This release of liability by Hamou and Hamou’s Businesses is intended to be all inclusive and comprehensive and is intended to finally settle and dispose of any and all claims, causes of action, debts, demands, obligations, liabilities and suits whatever, of any kind or character, whether known or unknown, that do or may exist in favor of Hamou and/or Hamou’s Businesses against Atchison and Pallasart. However, nothwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein, in the event that Hamou or Hamou’s Businesses shall obtain a finding by a court of competent jurisdiction that Atchison has violated the Permanent Injunction, without regard to the amount, if any, of any damages, if any, suffered by Hamou or Hamou’s Businesses as a result of such violation, then, in such event, the release given by Hamou and Hamou’s Businesses shall be void, ab initiio, and shall be without force or effect and, further, the parties agree that any and all applicable statutes of limitation that may or do impair, limit or bar any claim or cause of action released hereunder by Hamou or Hamou’s Businesses shall be waived by Atchison and that Hamou and Hamou’s Businesses shall have the right but not the obligation to refile any claim or cause of action hereinabove released for a period of six (6) months from the date of the entry of the judgment or order of the court finding the aforementioned violation of the Permanent Injunction and Atchison agrees that, with respect to any such refilled claim or cause of action he shall in no event raise a defense of limitations or laches.

5. Atchison, in consideration of the covenants herein of Hamou and Hamou’s Businesses, does hereby RELEASE and forever DISCHARGE Hamou and Hamou’s Businesses and all of her and her Businesses’ agents, servants and representatives, successors and assigns from any and all claims, causes of action, debts, demands, obligations, liabilities and suits whatever, of any kind or character, whether known or unknown, in any manner and in any capacity claimed, owned, held or possessed by Atchison, or his agents, servants, representatives, successors or assigns, whether or not any such claim, cause of action, debt, demand, obligation, liability or suit was raised in the Lawsuit. This release of liability by Atchison is intended to be all inclusive and comprehensive and is intended to finally settle and dispose of any and all claims, causes of action, debts, demands, obligations, liabilities and suits whatever, of any kind or character, whether known or unknown, that do or may exist in favor Atchison against Hamou or Hamou’s Businesses.

6. Atchison and Hamou and Hamou’s Businesses agree that the parties are free to publish and distribute, without restriction or limitation, a signed statement of Atchison identical in form and substance to Exhibit “C” attached hereto and made a part hereof. Atchison agrees that he shall publish the aforementioned statement, completely and without editorial comment or amendment, and the Permanent Injunction on the Alexander Palace website (www.alexanderpalance.org) for a period of one-hundred twenty (120) consecutive days from the date of the entry of the Permanent Injunction.

7. Other than as set forth within this Agreement, Hamou agrees that she will not, in her individual capacity or through Hamou’s Businesses make any statements about Atchison or Pallasart in the future. Atchison understands and agrees that Hamou must undertake a series of communications directed to the public in general and, particularly, directed to interested third parties concerning the subject matter of the Lawsuit in an effort to rehabilitate her reputation and that of Hamou’s Businesses. Atchison further understands and agrees that such communications shall be unfettered and that Hamou will necessarily refute various allegations and statements previously made by Atchison and will assert that various allegations are false, misleading or otherwise factually in error.

8. Atchison agrees he will either not direct others to do so or go within two-hundred (200) yards of any of Hamou, Enigma and The Sarskaia Foundation’s place of business. Atchison also agrees that he will neither direct nor go within two-hundred (200) yards of Hamou’s residence.

9. The foregoing represents the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the settlement of the Lawsuit. This Agreement may not be modified by the parties hereto unless such modification is in writing and signed by all parties to this Agreement.

10. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas. In the event of a breach of this Agreement, the parties agree that any claim or action asserting such breach may be filed in the then current county of the state in which either Hamou or Atchison is domiciled, provided, however, that nothing herein shall operate to impair or limit the ability of the parties to file an action in any venue available under law and shall in no manner impair or limit the remedies of Hamou and Hamou’s Businesses to enforce, by contempt or otherwise, the Permanent Injunction entered by the court in connection with this settlement.

EXECUTED THIS _____ day of _________________________, 2005.


The Sarskaia Foundation

By:______________________________

Title: _____________________________

Enigma Films, Inc.

By: _________________________________


Title: _____________________________


Enigma Royal Films, LLC

By: _______________________________


Title: _____________________________


Enigma Royal Films, Inc

By: _______________________________


Title: _____________________________


Pallasart Web Ventures, Inc


By: _______________________________


Title: _____________________________


____________________________
ROBERT ATCHISON

STATEMENT OF ROBERT ATCHISON

The undersigned, Robert Atchison, issues this public statement in connection with the lawsuit, Cause No. GN303141; Robert Atchison, Plaintiff, v. Oma Hamou Defendant; In the District Court, 345th Judicial District of Travis County, Texas (“Lawsuit”).

The lawsuit has been settled and I have agreed to issue this public statement in connection with this settlement. I have also agreed to be made subject to a Permanent Injunction which has been entered by the court in connection with this settlement.

In the past, I have made statements concerning Oma Hamou, the Sarskaia Foundation, Enigma Films, Inc., Enigma Royal Films, LLC, Enigma Royal Films, Inc. and the film, “As A Matter of Honour.” These statements have dealt generally with allegations of criminal conduct on the part of Ms. Hamou and certain commercial debts purportedly associated with Ms. Hamou’s filmmaking activities. These statements have been communicated by me to the general public via the internet and to various third parties such as governmental organizations, prospective lenders, industry professionals and other third parties in private conversations and written communications.

Statements that I have made both verbally and in written form concerning Ms. Hamou and her related organizations and entities regarding the aforementioned subject matters have been false and misleading. I have agreed pursuant to the Permanent Injunction entered in the Lawsuit to no longer make any statements regarding Ms. Hamou or any of the previously mentioned organizations, other than referring to the fact there was a lawsuit, it was settled, and this statement, and I have agreed that any statements by me relating the fact that there was a lawsuit and that it was settled will only be communicated together with the complete text of this statement.

Further, I agree to publish this statement and the Permanent Injunction on the Alexander Palace website (www.alexanderpalance.org) for a period of one-hundred twenty (120) consecutive days the date of the entry of the Permanent Injunction.

Most particularly I wish to publicly state that I recognize that two topics I have commented upon have caused particular distress for Ms. Hamou and I wish to speak directly to those matters.

Firstly, I have no personal knowledge or information which would support in any manner the unsubstantiated allegation that Ms. Hamou or her associates or colleagues attempted to hire a third party to harm or murder me, Robert Atchison. It is my understanding that the law enforcement authorities investigating this matter have closed their files based upon an absence of evidence to support these allegations. I have no reason to believe that there has ever been any substance or merit to these allegations.

Secondly, with respect to the various statements made by me or made by others and republished by me regarding Father Markell of St. Petersburg, Russia and The Fedorovsky Cathedral in St. Petersburg, Russia, I wish to publicly state that I have no personal knowledge that Ms. Hamou took any action that made Father Markell “homeless”, that she seduced him or otherwise had any inappropriate relationship with him or that Father Markell was required to or did repay a loan to J. P. Morgan Bank on behalf of Oma Hamou or any of her related entities and, thirdly, I acknowledge that Ms. Hamou did undertake restoration efforts for The Fedorovsky Cathedral and the Alexander Palace.

My specific reference to the above two topics (regarding an allegation that Ms. Hamou attempted to harm or murder me and the comments regarding The Fedorovsky Cathedral and Father Markell) are not intended to diminish in any way my full and complete retraction of any false or misleading statements I have made in the past regarding Ms. Hamou and the aforementioned entities and organizations. It is simply that I understand that the allegations associated with these two topics have been most offensive to Ms. Hamou.

In no manner do I wish to impede the production of the film, “As A Matter of Honour” or do or say anything that could possibly reflect poorly on her commendable and worthwhile effort to restore any historical monuments in Russia. I wish Ms. Hamou the best in these endeavors. I sincerely regret any harm or damage suffered by Ms. Hamou, personally, or suffered by any of the organizations and entities affiliated with her, or any person associated with this lawsuit. Again, to the extent that any of my previous statements have caused Ms. Hamou concern, embarrassment, or humiliation, I am truly sorry.

­­____________________________ ____________
Robert ATCHISON Date

Source: AA Legends & OmaHamou.com

Source: Texas Case Case No. GN303141 - Affidavit of Oma Hamou & http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2006/12/bob-atchisons-plots-against-oma-hamou.html & http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2006/12/on-aa-legends-mike-newson-postedthings.html

Photo Source: OmaHamou.com

Did Oma Hamou Kidnap A Child?

UPDATE

OmaHamouReality Blog reports as a fact:

[Excerpts] "...Late 1990: Oma Hamou has published on the internet documents and statements supporting her "running away" from her "abusive" Husband Demian. She admits taking "children" with her... Oma Hamou clearly has no regard for authority or proper legal channels, as evidenced by her own actions. See? Rather than turn to proper legal channels who were already involved, Oma Hamou KIDNAPPED A CHILD SHE HAD NO LEGAL AUTHORITY OVER NOR LEGAL RIGHT TO TAKE. She had only been married for SIX MONTHS to Marcus Demain, yet absconded with HIS child without authority to do so. Oma Hamou will tell you that "the ends justify the means" that she was "protecting" the child when she kidnapped him..."

According to OmaHamou.com, Oma Hamou and Marcus Demian had been together for 4 years. Law enforcement in the State of Montana confirmed Oma Hamou never “kidnapped” Marcus Demian’s children, thus debunking yet another claim made by the folks over on that other blog. In 1990, according to law enforcement in Montana Marcus Demian kidnapped his own children from their mother and wouldn’t give me any other information citing anything having to do with children was protected by the State.

Hamou herself talks about this incident by pointing out in the midst of domestic upheaval the courts gave custody of Demian’s two small children to their biological mother. When the Sherriff delivered the children to their mother and Hamou they were told to get out of Dodge as fast as they could because Marcus Demian was mad as hell and gunning for bear.

Hamou claims she hid the children, their mother and her own small child in a different city until Demian found out where she was hiding them. Waiting for Hamou to leave the apartment Demian convinces his ex-wife to travel to the State of California with their children there he explained the State of Montana would cease to have jurisdiction. Days later according to Hamou Demian travels to California but he's not alone he is accompanied by a man who he hires to impersonate a police officer.

This “police officer” tells the biological mother that he is there to arrest her and Demian ends up kidnapping the children taking them back to Montana. Once he is in Montana his vehicle is surrounded at gun point by law enforcement and the children are placed in foster care as wards of the State.

AFTERMATH: The man who impersonated a police officer is arrested pleads guilty while Demian himself keeps his distance and maintains he had nothing to do with it. The biological mother is considered to be dead and according to Hamou to this day, Demian maintains his actions were heroic. According to Mike Newson, Hamou has the arrest record of the man Demian hired to impersonate an officer as well as the canceled check which was issued by Marcus Demian. Both Newson and Justin Edwards claim at no time has anyone from Team Hamou published the name of Demian's son, therefore one has to conclude this information was provided by Marcus Demian.

MARCUS DEMIAN KIDNAPS CHILDREN

INFO FROM HAMOU’S CIVIL LAWSUIT AGAINST PALLASAT, ATCHISON & MOSHEIN:

http://www.omahamou.com/2nd%20Amended%20Counterclaim1.pdf

INVASION OF PRIVACY

[Excerpts] "...Hamou hereby incorporates herein by reference paragraphs 19 through 40 above. Defendants have intentionally and maliciously invaded the privacy of Hamou both by unauthorized disclosure and intrusion into the private life of Hamou in a manner that is of no legitimate interest to Defendants, much less the public, to whom they disclosed such information. Hamou does not intentionally disclose the location of her residence to the general public because her former husband, who is the subject of a restraining order issued by a Los Angeles court, has in the past physically beat and assaulted her and her child. The aforementioned ex-spouse has a well-documented history of persistent, violent attacks against Hamou and she makes every effort to restrict the public disclosure of her home address. With complete knowledge of this circumstance, having been fully informed of the danger involved, Defendants have posted Hamou’s address on the Pallasart’s website for no reason other than to invite the public to contact her at her home..."

Hospital/Police/Court records indicate Oma Hamou was abused by Marcus Demian on multiple occasions.

Out of no where Marcus Demian appears on the scene and issues threats to Hamou. I think it is safe to say, if it had not been because of Bob Atchison, Rob Moshein & Pallasart this would have never happened:

May, 8, 2007 in a letter to Oma Hamou Marcus Demian writes:

[Excerpts] "...Oma you fucking whore...Your going down bitch for all the misery you have caused to people...You are less than a roach. It is time someone stepped on you and did what should have been done a long time ago...Put you in prison...You are going to hell... I hope you sleep fitfully...You know who this is..."

According to Mike Newson, in other communications Demian tells Hamou he is in contact with Hamou’s stalkers, that being Atchison/Moshein et.al.

Hamou's attorney summed up the motive behind Pallasart/Bob Atchison/Rob Moshein zeal towards her:

$&

Photo Source: Internet Archives OmaHamou.com & Kidnapping Document provided by Mike Newson with permission by Oma Hamou

I was going to write about my weekend trip to Idyllwild, but I have a very big Wednesday and no time right now. Instead, I'll leave you with something Mike Newson sent to APO by way of eMail:

Perfection? No one that I know of has reached that stage, well excepting one person, the Messiah of Christian belief --- Jesus. And look at how his contemporaries treated him, let alone believed him! If the Internet had existed back then what would his enemy’s have done to him? When he was crucified they did not just figuratively do it like Oma Hamou has been crucified by her stalkers, and now her ex husband who has intruded on the scene lending his own distinct flavor to the mix.

In any case, there are skeletons buried in everyone’s closet. Not one of us can say that we are lily white, that we have never done something that we are not proud of. Does Oma have a checkered past?

Well according to the documentation dealing with her past she sure does, at the very least I think we can call her past colorful. I don’t see anywhere where she attempts to say that she is some goody two shoes girl from next door that is as pure as the driven snow. If anything she has been outspoken that she has made mistakes, stood up once more, attempted to rectify them and move on and up. If one looks at the life of many of the “greats” in history one finds all kinds of feet of clay and this continues right up to today as in President Clinton’s Monica situation.

What does all this have to do with Oma Hamou and her stalkers/vigilantes?

Well the odds are, in that they are human, that they are not without “sin” either, and yet they have thrown many stones at Oma. So how should we judge them?

What do we find in the way of motivation behind their actions toward Oma, not just Bob Atchison/Rob Moshein/Pallasart and the rest of that cult like group, but in the actions of her ex husband who recently said that he was in contact with Oma’s stalkers and then we find within minutes that the current Hate-Oma Blog --- that has nothing to do with Rob/Bob, et. al. and is not in communication with them at all --- knows all about it. I think if one examines the timing of the events you would have to conclude that the circumstances are such that one is forced to doubt the claims of non-involvement with Oma’s stalkers.

Looking at all the recent events one has to wonder, what would life have been like for Oma Hamou if she had never met her Ex Husband Marcus Demian (Herman Schloss and many other aliases) , and even more so -- Rob Moshein and Bob Atchison? One thing for sure, she would have a lot “duller” past and I doubt that everyone who is following the soap opera of her life would be doing so now.

Anyway, other than commenting on recent events, where am I going with this?

Well it seems that when one looks at a crime one first looks for motivation and opportunity. As to opportunity? Well if one is attempting to ruin someone’s reputation then we all have the opportunity now that the Internet sends our words to millions of people in an instant.

So let’s turn to motivation, firstly the new Hate-Oma Hamou site on BlogSpot that has “nothing” to do with Rob Moshein/Bob Atchison/Pallasart --- what is their motivation? What drives them to keep up the attack? Why is it their job to rid the world of Oma Hamou?

Answers to these questions are vital to understanding why they say what they say about Oma. Or more recently --- What drove Oma’s ex husband to do what he did way back when, and why the hostility today, why does he still need to discredit Oma? Given the number of women that he married, one can gather some reason for his initial interest in her, especially if you have seen photos from her early years (a wolf whistle would be appropriate here).

Knowing somewhat of Oma’s early years I can see how someone who had enticed ten women to marry him and who knows how many others may have been invited to his bed - before, during and after his marriage to Oma, well it is possible to understand how he added one more wife to the notches on his gun. Then having read the Montana State Register and the Montana Supreme Court ruling published here about Marcus --- well it is of no surprise that he attempted to destroy her reputation as well (and almost her life.) As if she were discredited - then one more witness to his actions was eliminated. Rob/Bob’s motivation in regard to the Alexander Palace and their obvious desire to control all that deals with it to a large extent allows us to understand some of their actions and this subject has been covered in vast detail previously. For the balance one has to dig deep into the psychology of the mind to understand what makes them do what they do.

The secret to understanding a person is in the motivation behind the actions. Sex, Greed and Power (control) seem to be the motivations behind Marcus and to a degree somewhat the same motivations could be said to apply to Rob/Bob albeit from a different direction. As to my motivation which I have stated many times in the past – well the story goes like this: I had recently met and photographed this woman named Oma and was in a situation such that I had some worries about another job she was asking me to do with regard to eventual recompense. I then discovered seeming evidence to justify my worries, but on further examination not being willing to accept a fact with out verification, I discovered inaccurate information being said about her and questioned it and instead was attacked myself as being Oma. One thing lead to another and instead of my leaving a situation where I was just doing a web design job, I was driven to find out why she was attacked such as she was, let alone why the vehement reaction to my simple comment of inaccuracy. The net result is a close friendship with a woman that I now admire for how she has stood up to the fires that have threatened to consume her.

Bottom line --- Bob/Rob turned me into her White Knight, forced me to discover the other side of the story and to defend Oma. And in turn I find the same weapons of libel and distortions of truth being wielded against my own person with as much devastation in emotional and physical well being, not to mention financial distress, as Oma has suffered, leaving me standing at the edge of personal ruin.

I am not defending her in terms of what she has done, as she has made as many mistakes as anyone I have ever heard of, if not more, but maybe because of those mistakes and the way she keeps standing back up and trying again and again with dogged determination to succeed. So the motivations behind me is the desire that right prevail, and an abhorrence of a bully attacking a woman --- contrast that to what the other side’s motivations appear to be.

Next comes the evidence. Notice that the evidence against Oma Hamou is constantly misinterpreted, not to mention that some of it was created to discredit her value as a witness. I’ve spent many, many, pages in the past picking apart the errors in interpretation, the outright lies, and the false conclusions. For instance notice that the Hate-Oma Blog along with “Herman” say that Oma was only married to him for three months, yet there has been published on the web the divorce decree that says that statement is a lie. (Who does that discredit? IS Herman/Marcus’s veracity immediately discredited? And in all honesty is not the report on that Hate-Oma Blog also discredited? Simply because they insist on maintaining as fact something which has been proven to be false.)

Still, most of what is claimed against Oma is in terms of having debt, and the majority of that happened because of events that can be directly traced back to the actions of Bob/Rob/Pallasart. Try reading up on most of the self made millionaires, and notice that on the average they declared bankruptcy eight times before “making it.” They, like Oma, just kept picking themselves back up “just one more time.”

One interesting thing is that on the Hate-Oma site they wonder about Oma’s usage of name in the divorce decree and yet a few lines latter show that she had not even married again and thus acquired the last name of Hamou. Is it not customary for a wife to take on the last name of her husband? So why is it that Oma having followed this custom is attacked as having done so?

As if this was one more reason to not believe her, to hate her.

Notice the new claims of having links to Oma Hamou in porn shots, and shudder (heaven forbid) “nude poses!” Yet just as in the past when Bob went to the police to report her they asked him if he had the evidence and he was forced to say no, but he was “working” on it, ---but it just had to be true. Well how hard is it to cut and paste a URL?

Either you have the URL or you don’t. If you don’t then you have never seen the evidence and are reporting a lie.

As to nude, well yes she has posed such that one can see her breasts, not to mention bare back and most of her cute behind. In fact I doubt that there is much of her which has not been seen by the camera - just as in any of the top models in this world. It is intriguing to notice the usage of Oma posed nude coupled with Oma did “whatever” to show that some how because of this she IS a horrible person whom you should hate and not believe, and yet when one looks at Rob/Bob’s history one finds many of the same things that they decry about her in their past, (well I don’t think they ever posed nude, but as to the rest of it…) does this not mean that we should judge them by the same standard that they claim Oma should be judged?

Could part of their motivation be that they have to destroy Oma’s creditability in order to protect their house of cards? Their grasp of ownership of control of all things Romanov?

No matter what I write or have written, those whose mind is closed to the possibilities that Rob/Bob, et. al. are not telling the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth will not comprehend what I have said, and those who believe Oma already and are her friends will just agree, but for those sitting on the fence, to you I suggest that there is reason to doubt the conclusions of those who would have you hate Oma, who have tried to discredit myself because I have championed her. Notice the motivation and emotional content of what “they” write about myself and Oma. Notice that they claim things that do not match up with reality, as in the words that Bob said in court that we have shown conflicted with his own sworn testimony. Let alone that the courts themselves show that what was claimed by Bob in court was true is not the truth. Does not that alone provide an element of doubt as to their basic believability? Notice how the courts have sided with Oma in regards to what “they” have said about her being potentially libelous. Notice how they “will” show you how Oma Hamou is a porn star, (as if this destroys her/our credibility) but have no proof, either they saw it and have the URL or they have not and are attempting to control your mind to induce hate and discredit her. Notice how they just say believe us. Yet when you look at the past words that have been written by myself and others, in Oma’s defense, we quoted documents that had been sworn to be true to the courts and then posted the entire document so you could tell if the quote had been taken out of context.

Truth is the best weapon in a battle such as this, it may not be a fast weapon, just as the truth did not keep Jesus from being crucified, but now look at it from a historical perspective… Truth will eventually win out, but in the mean time the power of a lie can kill.

A MESSAGE FOR BOB ATCHISON, ROB MOSHEIN & PALLASART WEB VENTURES, INC

& IT'S SUBORDINATES

You've been put on legal notice by way of eMail, US Mail and other communications that Oma Hamou intends to pursue criminal & civil litigation against you therefore if you destroy any evidence such as communications from anyone having to do with Hamou, Enigma or Sarskaia there will be legal ramifications.

Mike Newson of AA Legends Forum - August 2006

Sting - Desert Rose

UPDATE

THE OMA HAMOU REALITY BLOG & IT'S CONNECTION TO BOB ATCHISON, ATCHISON'S WEB DESIGN COMPANY, PALLASART & ROB MOSHEIN ET.AL

POINT NUMBER #1: The Oma Hamou Reality Blog publishes an email which we are told was sent to Mike Newson from a "Patricia" (the "alleged" hitman's wife) who then forwards it to Rob Moshein. Both Edwards and Newson (from OmaHamou.com) have pointed out the email in question has never been published on the web or elsewhere. So how did the author who claims he/she is not in contact with Pallasart/Atchison et.al get it?

POINT NUMBER #2: In the past Bob Atchison claimed to friends, to the public, through his attorney and in court documents that he did not create the web site known as OMA HAMOU REPORT yet according to the police record from June of 2oo4 he states "HE" created it to warn others of Hamou's character.

So when was/is Bob telling the truth?

Using some legal jargon I’ve read in recent pleadings that I think hits the nail on the head on at least the conspiracy allegation: Pallasart and each of them, Bob Atchison /Rob Moshein have singly and together in combination and in concert, conspired to defame and destroy Oma Hamou. Acting in accordance with a methodical, organized and coordinated campaign of deceit and deception, Pallasart and Bob have intentionally sought to discredit and injure Oma, without legal justification or excuse.

Bob Atchison has conspired with others to harm Oma Hamou.

In court document related to Oma’s lawsuit against Pallasart, Bob Atchison and Rob Moshein in Bob’s sworn Affidavit dated March 5, 2005 state:

No. 6: "...With regard to “The Oma Hamou Report”, I have no involvement with it whatsoever. I have never read the Oma Hamou Report, nor have I ever written anything on or about The Oma Hamou Report. I did not learn of its existence until late summer or early fall of 2004 when my attorney told me about it due to the present litigation.
See: http://www.omahamou.com/pdf/affidavit/exhibit013.pdf

In a letter dated July 9, 2004 sent to Author/Historian Peter Kurth, Bob Atchison wrote: “I know this website must really set her off, but she has brought it on herself”
See: http://www.omahamou.com/pdf/affidavit/exhibit050.pdf

POINT NUMBER #3. Both Bob Atchison and Rob Moshein have proven themselves especially through court documentation as being dishonest men.

POINT NUMBER #4. According to Justin Edwards, Hamou receives an email from her ex-husband a Marcus Demian stamped dated "8, May 2007 22:08:24 -0700" stating:

"...I am in touch with the Stalkers as you quaintly put them...The bell of retribution is coming your way..."

POINT NUMBER #5: Most importantly, on *Thu Aug 10, 2006 6:10 pm (*authenticated*) Rob Moshein stated on the AA Legends Forum he knew the author of the OmaHamouReality blog and goes on to to say if Hamou wanted it deleted (gone) then all she had to do was have me (Sandman) delete mine.

And 'still' they expect us to believe they are not in contact with Rob Moshein, Bob Atchison or anyone else connected to Atchison's company.

Pallasart/Bob Atchison & Rob Moshein's various web sites attracts the attention of Hamou's ex-Husband, a Marcus Demian who teams up with Pallasart/Bob Atchison et al. According to Justin Edwards, Demian has a history of violence and is purported to have not seen or spoken to Hamou in 17 years.

A Nancy Hart of New York City published excerpts from one of Demian's first eMails to Hamou was a threat which read:

"...Oma you fucking whore...Your going down bitch for all the misery you have caused to people...You are less than a roach. It is time someone stepped on you and did what should have been done a long time ago...Put you in prison...You are going to hell... I hope you sleep fitfully...You know who this is..."