UPDATE

Pallasart's Oma Hamou Report Website

Declares the site does not belong to Bob Atchison.

Now, read what Bob Atchison told the police in Austin Texas, the FBI and in California that HE created the website Oma Hamou Report he did it because he wanted to warn the public about Oma Hamou's character. Law enforcement from all these different agencies went to his website and downloaded a copy of the eleven (11) page Oma Hamou Report website which they said outlined Atchison's ALLEGATIONS against Oma.

Reading Oma Hamou Report website (above document) it states it was last updated on July 30, 2004 yet on July 16, 2004 he contacts law enforcement and ADMITS to creating the website Oma Hamou Report. To the public and his friends he reports he has nothing to do with this website. Comparing the similar style writing of the blog Oma Hamou Reality to Atchison's other sites about Hamou it seems credible that Atchison created the blog. It screams, they are not connected to Atchison, Moshein or Pallasart yet the public has been lied too in the past so why believe them now?

In Bob Atchison's Oral Deposition Case No. 303541 Atchison v. Hamou - January 11, 2005, while under oath he says he didn't know anything about the website Oma Hamou Reality and learned about it through his attorney. However, in July 2004 he told the police in Austin, Texas, the FBI and other law enforcement agencies in California that he created the web site known as Oma Hamou Report. Here is a copy of Bob Atchison's Deposition where he states under oath that he has never contributed any text to the site known as Oma Hamou Report.


On the forum "Legends of Anastasia" both Mike Newson and Justin Edwards said the web site known as Oma Hamou Report was first published in May 2004. The IP log records belonging to Oma Hamou Report show it belonged to Pallasart Web Ventures a company owned by no other than the Alexander Palace Time Machine website owner, Bob Atchison.

Take note of the name used to create the account for Pallasart's Oma Hamou Report web site: "Ernst VonHesse" - Bob Atchison told law enforcement he created the web site Oma Hamou Report and like the police, I believe he did.

OMA HAMOU REALITY BLOG TRUTH OR FICTION?

Today Oma Hamou issued yet another warning to the folks over on Oma Hamou Reality blog:

To the creators of the Oma Hamou Reality Blog, I demand that you immediately ‘cease and desist’ from making false, defamatory and libelous statements concerning me. The statements on the Blog published or otherwise communicated to third parties concerning Enigma, Sarskaia and/or myself have been blatant fabrications, self-serving, and demonstrate a course of conduct calculated to harass and oppress. Such conduct exposes you and all involved to substantial liability. I strongly caution you to refrain from further such publications or other communications to third parties. The information provided on Pallasart’s “Oma Hamou Report” (“OH Report”) and its Alexander Palace Time Machine’s the “Tangled Affairs of Hamou, Enigma & Sarskaia” (“AP Report”), together with the Blog Oma Hamou Reality, has been and remains libelous. The authors of these various sites should not infer, based on incomplete information or the absence of information, that certain events happened, or did not happen, in my life. Such fallacious, incomplete, incorrect, and deliberately libelous reports concerning me and my life imperil my existing economic benefits, resulting in substantial damages to me. Source: OmaHamou.com/oma

The Real Time Line of Oma Demian's Criminal Convictions:
http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2006/10/bob-atchisons-friend-man-going-by-web.html

Is Oma Hamou a Victim? http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2008_02_01_archive.html#736155445923375068

Pallasart and the Art of Film making: http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2006/12/tonight-on-aa-legends-mike-newson_26.html

Oma Hamou Reality Blogs Statements About a David Davidson & American Express:
http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2006/12/authorhistorian-peter-kurth-wrote.html

The California Better Business Bureau - The link provided by the Oma Hamou Reality blog doesn't rate Enigma as a D but an A - their own link proves they are lying liars!

OMA HAMOU REALITY LINK: http://www.labbb.org/BBBWeb/Forms/Business/CompanyReportPage_Expository.aspx?CompanyID=13194901

http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2007/02/image-hosted-by-imageshackus.html

Oma Hamou Reality Blog accuses Hamou of committing several crimes including but not limited, Kidnapping:
http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2007/05/did-oma-hamou-kidnap-child.html

Did Hamou Really Hire someone to kill Bob Atchison???
http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2007/05/atchisonmoshein-claims-hamou-hired.html & http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2006/12/bob-atchisons-plots-against-oma-hamou.html

Did Enigma have real projects? http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2006/12/energy-summit-of-2003-and-enigma-films.html

Bob Atchison & Cult "repeatedly" lie to law enforcement in an attempt to rid society of Oma Hamou

http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2006/12/bob-atchisons-plots-against-oma-hamou.html & http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2006/11/cult-surrounding-alexander-palace-in.html & http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2007/03/who-is-poster-who-calls-himself-tsarfan.html &
http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2006/12/energy-summit-of-2003-and-enigma-films.html

More Inaccuracies..
http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2006/12/tonight-on-aa-legends-mike-newson_26.html

Has Oma Hamou Been Stalked?
http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2006/12/found-this-according-to-mike-newson.html & http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2006/12/those-who-stalkso-who-is-tonya-hoochie.html & http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2007/01/tonight-on-aa-legends-mike-newson.html & http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2006/08/bob-atchison-snubs-cease-desist-letter.html & http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2007/04/la-times-recent-article-on-defmation.html

What is legitimate About Pallasart?
http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2006/12/what-is-legitimate-alexanderpalace.html

Oma Hamou Reality Blog Defames, Slanders Mike Newson: http://omahamourealityblogisafraudsite.blogspot.com/2006/12/just-who-is-mike-newson-blog.html

Oma Hamou Reality Blog Statements About a Don Morton
http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2006/12/credibility-is-key-question-here.html

Sandman's Post on Oma Hamou.com

http://omahamou.com/oma/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=18&start=45

Throughout this whole ordeal one point has stood out above all others. You have to be very careful in reading Rob Moshein’s words. He does have a way with words, when you read his statements, the way he says things lead you to believe one thing, while the real meaning is different. I also have to stand back and “admire” (in a word smith way) his and Bob Atchison’s ability to take a portion of a fact and add on to it and twist it around until they have taken you down the garden path to a conclusion that is not supported by the facts. Not only are their conclusions not supported but typically the facts are only stated and never documented. Yet, such is their skill that one believes the whole chain of thoughts right up to and including the conclusion that twists the whole construct of words into a falsehood.

At least Oma Hamou in the past, as now, when she found that she had made a mistake has admitted and corrected herself, while we have spent yards and yards of words correcting “them” (Rob/Bob, et. al.) and they just keep saying the same things. Even now what I am reading in Rob’s comments leads me to believe that in spite of all that Oma has provided to show that her points are valid and documented, that because she made one recent mistake on a number, that the WHOLE of Oma’s words are false. Yet even though those on Hamou's side have shown point, after point, after point, all backed up with documentation to demonstrate that what he claims in regard to Oma is not correct --- he still writes as though “HE” should be believed. Although he does not provide the transcripts or other documentation confirming specific events --- we are expected to believe what he said on the strength that he said it.

Mike Newson, Hamou's attorneys and others have seen firsthand how Oma goes to “pieces” while under their guns. Such that she has said things without fully thinking them through, more of a reaction rather than a response. Such as the recent error on the two judges. What I like about her is that in such instances she humbly accepts the corrections and admits to the mistake. Throughout this verbal war, she has been on the defensive, which is probably never been clearer than in the recent skirmish. She is defending herself by showing that what they claimed is not the complete truth, attempting to create doubt in their conclusions.

The largest basis for their claims is “because Fact X is true, and Fact Y is true (and because “I” {images of greatness and trust are implied in how they do this} am the one saying it), then my false conclusion is also Truth (with a capital T)” thus you should believe me and everything I say. One of their standard methods is to denigrate anyone who opposes them. As in Oma must be telling lies as she was convicted of writing bad checks once. Thus even the Judge KNEW that she was telling lies, and Rob Mosehin gives the impression that just because the lawyer at George & Brothers, LLP who presented the testimony is associated with this known “Hardened Criminal” that the lawyer is not to be believed either. I love how he writes such that HE KNOWS what was in the mind of the judge, as in this statement “Her failure to appear was one reason among others why Judge Livingston denied the Continuance Motion.” Again it is as if since the previous words had some truth, then you must believe this statement of conclusion also.

Another example is this line, “WHEN ASKED TO PRODUCE MEDICAL RECORDS TO SUPPORT HER CLAIM OF ALLEGED "ILLNESS", SHE COULD NOT.” (The underline and emphasis was added by Oma.) The implication was Oma was there and the Judge asked her and she was unable and in fact COULD not document her claim of bad health, with the inference that she was lying as she was never sick in the first place and that's why the court didn't believe her attorney. Which conclusion, as you read the rest of the statement, is encouraged by the writer.

When you dig a bit you notice that he is in effect saying that Oma was present and could not produce the evidence as she was not and had not been sick. Yet the facts do not support the conclusion. Also notice the negative connotations throughout. There is never any attempt to be an impartial story teller; in every case the intent is to put the most negative slant possible on any situation involving Oma Hamou.

Source: OmaHamou.com/oma, Pallasart's Oma Hamou Report

IN HER OWN WORDS:

UPDATE 3/17/2008

Read what Oma Hamou has to say about Rob Moshein new blog:

Re: Do you believe this forum was design to defame and libel?

[Excerpt} "...Can I prove that Rob Moshein stalked me? Yes. Can I prove that both he and Bob conspired with others to harm me? Yes. Can I prove that Bob Atchison filed false police reports against me? Yes. Can I prove he committed perjury at trial and throughout our respective lawsuits? Yes. Can I prove that he is lying when he claims a previous lawsuit existed within Texas and a settlement had been reached? Yes. Can I prove Bob Atchison was involved in any settlement negotiations between his company and Enigma? Yes. Can I prove Bob Atchison and his company, Pallasart ripped me off for more than $10,000? Yes. Can I prove the images displayed on the Alexander Palace Time Machine web site is mine? Yes. Can I prove Bob Atchison conspired with others to harm me? Yes. Can I prove that Pallasart conspired with others to harm me? Yes. Can I prove that Bob Atchison made up the entire story about me hiring a hit man to murder him? Yes. Can I prove Pallasart published my social security number on the web for no other reason but to have people use it? Yes. Can I prove one of these entities falsely used my name to gain information and to harm me? Yes. Can I prove Pallasart conspired with others to give false testimony to the police? Yes. Can I prove Pallasart accusaed me of kidnapping and stealing people's identies? Yes. Can I prove Pallasart invaded my privacy? Yes. Can I prove Pallasart has defrauded others including myself? Yes. Can I prove Pallasart, Bob and Rob Moshein destroyed my reputation and career? Yes. Can I prove that Pallasar, Bob Atchison and Rob Moshein have libel, slander and defame me, Enigma and Sarskaia? Yes. I can prove every word I publish. Can I prove Bob Atchison forged documents?Oh, yes! Can I prove Pallasart asked members of its forum to harass and stalk me? Yes. Can I prove Bob Atchison asked Rob Moshein to violate a court order? Yes. I can prove this and so much more. I hope Bob and Rob are convicted for the crimes they've committed against me. I hope the court issues a permanent injunction against them. I hope these two men and their "friends" will never be able to do this to another human being again!In some of the police reports Bob claims he created the web site Oma Hamou Report to warn others about my character and Rob in several different letters forwarded to me and in the Discovery process from our previous lawsuit claimed the site was created to warn people about my character. Their new blog which Pallasart endorses claims to be a site designed to warn people about my character. Well, now it's my turn as I am warning the public about them!..."

http://www.omahamou.com/oma/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=18

Story developing...

In this letter written by Bob Atchison to the American Chamber of Commerce in Russia about Oma Hamou, he states as a matter of fact that Hamou was never on the cover of Variety, an entertainment magazine. In fact he states as a matter of fact that Variety informed him no such cover existed. Based upon Moshein and Atchison's blog and web sites on Hamou we know this to be a lie since Enigma currently owes money to this entertainment magazine. This letter is written by a man who claims to be a historian and author, a man that has a track record of forging documents and lying, a man who by all accounts should be prosecuted for the crimes he has committed against Oma Hamou.